From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750823Ab1IPAUG (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:20:06 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:58325 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750711Ab1IPAUE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:20:04 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="48967864" Message-ID: <4E729631.40801@intel.com> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:20:01 +0800 From: Huang Ying User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110831 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "rick@microway.com" CC: Don Zickus , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Richard Houghton , ACPI Devel Mailing List , Len Brown , Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: kernel oops and panic in acpi_atomic_read under 2.6.39.3. call trace included References: <201108171751.51648.rick@microway.com> <8338f9871d1f52f9376a1eca319a7866.squirrel@www.microway.com> <201108222047.11086.rjw@sisk.pl> <201108221651.35654.rick@microway.com> <20110823171432.GA10794@redhat.com> <4E547B0F.6000001@intel.com> <7f348bab30fb6be7706ef35af999e5b1.squirrel@www.microway.com> <4E56EA02.7020307@intel.com> <50815a5ec08cdb713de8eaa92ad6e8b3.squirrel@www.microway.com> <4E6438DC.4010007@intel.com> <4fc342c27daa84e68a93a59d5206a168.squirrel@www.microway.com> In-Reply-To: <4fc342c27daa84e68a93a59d5206a168.squirrel@www.microway.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Rick, On 09/16/2011 02:35 AM, rick@microway.com wrote: > Hi Huang, > > I've been running for a while now with this new patch. I have not gotten > any panic output though. This is the only output I have from GHES: > > [22256.616069] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370 > [102115.873369] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370 > [175460.888809] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370 > [223652.976925] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370 > [284678.016631] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370 > [321563.363578] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370 > [500789.731559] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370 > [539808.495653] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370 > [545116.419274] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370 > [686744.665292] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370 > > Do you think changing from 5620-5670 cpus changed the behavior? Don't know why too. Best Regards, Huang Ying