public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
To: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
	agk@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: request baset device mapper in Linux
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:50:08 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E76D810.6010504@ce.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110916140839.GE7428@ics.muni.cz>

Hi Lukas,

On 09/16/11 23:08, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:49:52PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> Does "with your patch" mean against 3.0.3 or the original 2.6.32 kernel?
>>
>> If you apply the patch to the 3.0.3 kernel do you regain the performance?
> 
> Unfortunately, the patch does not help with 3.0.3 kernel

Thanks for the additional testing.

So:

  2.6.32.36
    no-multipath:        2.8 GB/s
    multipath:           600 MB/s
    multipath w/ patch:  2.8-2.9 GB/s

  3.0.3
    no-multipath:        ??
    multipath:           2.5 GB/s
    multipath w/ patch:  2.5 GB/s(?)

Have you tried 3.0.3 without multipath?

> top looks like this:
>    63 root      20   0     0    0    0 S   38  0.0   0:16.65 kswapd1
>    18 root      20   0     0    0    0 R   32  0.0   0:14.38 kworker/4:0
>    19 root      20   0     0    0    0 R   30  0.0   0:20.88 ksoftirqd/4
>   153 root      20   0     0    0    0 R   29  0.0   0:14.46 kworker/4:2
>    62 root      20   0     0    0    0 S   22  0.0   0:09.44 kswapd0

dm-multipath itself does not use workqueue for normal I/Os.
So you might be hitting a different problem.

Thanks,
-- 
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-19  5:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-20  8:26 request baset device mapper in Linux Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-07-21 11:11 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2011-07-21 13:26   ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-07-22  6:56     ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2011-07-22  8:19       ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-07-23  7:28         ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-07-24 22:16           ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-08-01  9:31             ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2011-09-08 13:27               ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-09-15 18:49                 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-09-16 14:08                   ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-09-19  5:50                     ` Jun'ichi Nomura [this message]
2011-09-29 20:57                       ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-10-05  8:13                         ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-10-05 10:35                           ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-10-06  5:11                             ` Jun'ichi Nomura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E76D810.6010504@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --to=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=xhejtman@ics.muni.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox