public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/6] xen: don't call vmalloc_sync_all() when mapping foreign pages
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:19:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E7BA677.9090907@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109221131390.8700@kaball-desktop>

On 09/22/2011 04:06 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> On 09/21/2011 03:42 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>>> This series is relying on regular ram mappings are already synced to all
>>>> tasks, but I'm not sure that's necessarily guaranteed (for example, if
>>>> you hotplug new memory into the domain, the new pages won't be mapped
>>>> into every mm unless they're synced).
>>> the series is using GFP_KERNEL, so this problem shouldn't occur, right?
>> What properties do you think GFP_KERNEL guarantees?
> That the memory is below 4G and always mapped in the kernel 1:1 region.

Hm, but that's not quite the same thing as "mapped into every
pagetable".  Lowmem pages always have a kernel virtual address, and its
always OK to touch them at any point in kernel code[*] because one can
rely on the fault handler to create mappings as needed - but that
doesn't mean they're necessarily mapped by present ptes in the current
pagetable.

[*] - except NMI handlers

> Regarding memory hotplug it looks like that x86_32 is mapping new memory
> ZONE_HIGHMEM, therefore avoiding any problems with GFP_KERNEL allocations.
> On the other hand x86_64 is mapping the memory ZONE_NORMAL and calling
> init_memory_mapping on the new range right away. AFAICT changes to
> the 1:1 mapping in init_mm are automatically synced across all mm's
> because the pgd is shared?

TBH I'm not sure.  vmalloc_sync_one/all does seem to do *something* on
64-bit, but I was never completely sure what regions of the address
space were already shared.  I *think* it might be that the pgd and pud
are not shared, but the pmd down is, so if you add a new pmd you need to
sync it into all the puds (and puds into pgds if you add a new one of
those).

But I'd be happier pretending that vmalloc_sync_* just doesn't exist,
and deal with it at the hypercall level - in the short term, by just
making sure that the callers touch all those pages before passing them
into the hypercall.

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-22 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-15 12:40 [PATCH 0/6] xen: don't call vmalloc_sync_all() when mapping foreign pages David Vrabel
2011-09-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] xen: add functions for mapping foreign pages over pages David Vrabel
2011-09-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: xen-blkback: use API provided by xenbus module to map rings David Vrabel
2011-09-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] net: xen-netback: " David Vrabel
2011-09-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] xen: xen-pciback: use xenbus_map_ring_page() " David Vrabel
2011-09-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] xen: xenbus: remove xenbus_map_ring_valloc() and xenbus_map_ring_vfree() David Vrabel
2011-09-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: remove vmalloc_sync_all() from alloc_vm_area() David Vrabel
2011-09-15 21:37 ` [PATCH 0/6] xen: don't call vmalloc_sync_all() when mapping foreign pages Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-21 10:42   ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-09-21 18:57     ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-22 11:06       ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-09-22 21:19         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2011-09-23 10:53           ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-09-23 11:18           ` David Vrabel
2011-09-21 14:44   ` David Vrabel
2011-09-23 15:11     ` David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E7BA677.9090907@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox