From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753626Ab1I1I1y (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:27:54 -0400 Received: from newsmtp5.atmel.com ([204.2.163.5]:6351 "EHLO sjogate2.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752153Ab1I1I1w (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:27:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4E82DA79.70006@atmel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:27:37 +0200 From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: atmel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann , "'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'" CC: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Linux Kernel list Subject: at91 material for 3.1 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, I have two little patches about Kconfig and one defconfig that are suitable for a 3.1 inclusion. I wonder if you plan a pull request to Linus before 3.1-final? If yes, would you prefer each patch in a feature branch on its own (at91-kconfig, at91-defconfig for instance) or a generic at91-fixes? Thanks, best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre