From: Brad Campbell <brad@fnarfbargle.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: airlied@redhat.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Radeon regression fix
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:21:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E848CDE.1020707@fnarfbargle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_PUcDVL+RPZPDGiAxHjn=vL7dnNsiQYG2F5e6GWnoX7Kg@mail.gmail.com>
On 29/09/11 22:36, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Brad Campbell<brad@fnarfbargle.com> wrote:
>> This patch fixes a regression introduced between 2.6.39& 3.1-rc1 whereby
>> the displayport AUX channel stopped re-trying commands that elicited a DEFER
>> response.
>>
>
> It should still be retrying, just restructured slightly. The retry
> logic just moved into radeon_dp_i2c_aux_ch(),
> radeon_dp_aux_native_write(), and radeon_dp_aux_native_read(), e.g.,
>
> else if ((ack& AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_MASK) == AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFER)
> udelay(400);
>
> Perhaps the delay is causing a problem. Does removing the udelay(400); help?
How's this look ?
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_dp.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_dp.c
index 7ad43c6..aa5624a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_dp.c
@@ -128,12 +128,14 @@ static int radeon_dp_aux_native_write(struct
radeon_connector *radeon_connector,
while (1) {
ret = radeon_process_aux_ch(dig_connector->dp_i2c_bus,
msg, msg_bytes, NULL, 0,
delay, &ack);
+ if (ret == 0 && ((ack & AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_MASK) ==
AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFER)){
+ udelay(400);
+ continue;
+ }
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if ((ack & AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_MASK) == AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_ACK)
break;
- else if ((ack & AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_MASK) ==
AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFER)
- udelay(400);
else
return -EIO;
}
@@ -158,14 +160,16 @@ static int radeon_dp_aux_native_read(struct
radeon_connector *radeon_connector,
while (1) {
ret = radeon_process_aux_ch(dig_connector->dp_i2c_bus,
msg, msg_bytes, recv,
recv_bytes, delay, &ack);
+ if (ret == 0 && ((ack & AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_MASK) ==
AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFER)){
+ udelay(400);
+ continue;
+ }
if (ret == 0)
return -EPROTO;
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if ((ack & AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_MASK) == AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_ACK)
return ret;
- else if ((ack & AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_MASK) ==
AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFER)
- udelay(400);
else
return -EIO;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-29 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-29 14:21 Radeon regression fix Brad Campbell
2011-09-29 14:36 ` Alex Deucher
2011-09-29 15:10 ` Brad Campbell
2011-09-29 15:21 ` Brad Campbell [this message]
2011-09-30 0:23 ` Brad Campbell
2011-09-30 4:59 ` Alex Deucher
2011-09-30 5:14 ` Brad Campbell
2011-09-30 5:39 ` Alex Deucher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E848CDE.1020707@fnarfbargle.com \
--to=brad@fnarfbargle.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox