public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] sched: Provide delayed wakeup list
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:01:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E886ED5.8060407@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110914133750.739484417@chello.nl>

Hi Peter,

Do you still work on the wake_up_list() patch?

On 09/14/2011 03:30 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>   /*
>    * wake flags
>    */
> @@ -1255,6 +1268,8 @@ struct task_struct {
>   	unsigned int btrace_seq;
>   #endif
>
> +	struct wake_list_node wake_list;
> +
>   	unsigned int policy;
>   	cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
A global wake_list
>
> @@ -2143,6 +2158,35 @@ extern void wake_up_new_task(struct task
>   extern void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p);
>   extern void sched_dead(struct task_struct *p);
>
> +static inline void
> +wake_list_add(struct wake_list_head *head, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	struct wake_list_node *n =&p->wake_list;
> +
> +	get_task_struct(p);
> +	/*
> +	 * Atomically grab the task, if ->wake_list is !0 already it means
> +	 * its already queued (either by us or someone else) and will get the
> +	 * wakeup due to that.
> +	 *
> +	 * This cmpxchg() implies a full barrier, which pairs with the write
> +	 * barrier implied by the wakeup in wake_up_list().
> +	 */
> +	if (cmpxchg(&n->next, 0, n) != 0) {
> +		/* It was already queued, drop the extra ref and we're done. */
> +		put_task_struct(p);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
A task can be only once on the wake_list.
> +	/*
> +	 * The head is context local, there can be no concurrency.
> +	 */
> +	n->next = head->first;
> +	head->first = n;
> +}
> +
> +extern void wake_up_list(struct wake_list_head *head, unsigned int state);
> +
>   extern void proc_caches_init(void);
>   extern void flush_signals(struct task_struct *);
>   extern void __flush_signals(struct task_struct *);
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -2916,6 +2916,25 @@ int wake_up_state(struct task_struct *p,
>   	return try_to_wake_up(p, state, 0);
>   }
>
> +void wake_up_list(struct wake_list_head *head, unsigned int state)
> +{
> +	struct wake_list_node *n = head->first;
> +	struct task_struct *p;
> +
> +	while (n != WAKE_LIST_TAIL) {
> +		p = container_of(n, struct task_struct, wake_list);
> +		n = n->next;
> +
> +		p->wake_list.next = NULL;
> +		/*
> +		 * wake_up_state() implies a wmb() to pair with the queueing
> +		 * in wake_list_add() so as not to miss wakeups.
> +		 */
> +		wake_up_state(p, state);
> +		put_task_struct(p);
> +	}
> +}
And wake_up_list() uses state.
That can't work:
What if one waker wants to wake TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and the other waker 
wants to wake TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE?

--
     Manfred

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-02 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-14 13:30 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] delayed wakeup list Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 13:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] sched: Provide " Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 13:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 14:08   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-09-14 14:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 15:35   ` Darren Hart
2011-09-14 15:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 15:49       ` Darren Hart
2011-09-16  7:59   ` Paul Turner
2011-09-16  7:59   ` Paul Turner
2011-09-16  8:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-02 14:01   ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2011-10-03 10:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 13:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] futex: Reduce hash bucket lock contention Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 15:46   ` Darren Hart
2011-09-14 15:51     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 16:00       ` Darren Hart
2011-09-14 20:49       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-16 12:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-17 12:57     ` Manfred Spraul
2011-09-19  7:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19  8:51         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 13:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] ipc/sem: Rework wakeup scheme Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-15 17:29   ` Manfred Spraul
2011-09-15 19:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-15 19:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-15 19:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-17 12:36       ` Manfred Spraul
2011-09-16 12:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-17 12:32       ` Manfred Spraul
2011-09-16 12:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 13:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] delayed wakeup list Eric Dumazet
2011-09-14 13:56   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E886ED5.8060407@colorfullife.com \
    --to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox