Re: kernel.org status: establishing a PGP web of trust

Alan Cox
2011-10-06T10:10:57Z

> When you add a Signed-off-by: to a patch you have to use your real name

Don't confuse real name and legal name. In particular remember

- Not all countries have a notion of legal name
- In many places 'real' and legal names are not particularly tied together
- Both legal and real names change but there is no kernel facility to
update existing sign offs.
- Some cultures have multiple names for people as the norm
- A lot of signed off entries are transliterated (We don't have many
signed off in Japanese or Chinese for example but mostly in
transliterated form)
- The "official" transliterations vary by country, and no specific
transliteration or indeed specific language is necessarily correct
- In many cases it is possible to change your "real" name to a nickname,
(and indeed back again). Genuine UK names for official purposes include
people like Mr Telephone Booth (changed his name for charity and kept
it), and "Fruitbat".

So can I suggest we leave that quagmire for Google+ to sink into and
flounder and stay well out of it.

A key merely proves that the person who signed the object had access to
the key. A signed key merely proves that someone or indeed something with
access to the relevant key data signed it. Even in person signing proves
surprisingly little. (Ob amusement - can one of a pair of identical
twins ever become a Debian developer)

It's an administrative convenience.

Signing patches is also only useful for tracing probable origin. It
doesn't prove they are any good. That's one reason I never signed any
security announcement when I was the CERT contact, it forced people to
check the announcement and advice made sense.

Alan