Re: kernel.org status: hints on how to check your machine for intrusion

Willy Tarreau
2011-10-02T18:27:48Z

On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 07:03:52AM -0500, Andy wrote:
> Many of us would benefit from having signatures for some of the recent
> kernels missing for your list as well as Willy's. For example, a few
> systems of mine run 2.6.39.4 due to sleep-related issues with 3.0.x+ and
> those hardware platforms.
>
> It would be great to have fingerprints for:
>
> 2.6.35.1 - 2.6.35.9 (2.6.35.14?)

2.6.35.1...11 were covered by my last mail. The signatures are
md5 but that should be enough for checking.

> 2.6.36.1 - 2.6.36.4
> 2.6.37.1 - 2.6.37.6
> 2.6.38.1 - 2.6.38.8
> 2.6.39.1 - 2.6.39.4

I did not have these tags.

Regards,
Willy