From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754462Ab1JCJms (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 05:42:48 -0400 Received: from na3sys009aob106.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.76]:47182 "EHLO na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753093Ab1JCJmk (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 05:42:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4E898388.40601@ti.com> Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:12:32 +0530 From: Santosh Shilimkar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/30] ARM/omap: omap specific randconfig fixes References: <1317566760-25681-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <4E894295.5000608@ti.com> <7246478.IyGHQ24uSq@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <7246478.IyGHQ24uSq@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 03 October 2011 02:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 03 October 2011 10:35:25 Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >>> The entire set is also available from >>> git pull git://git.linaro.org/people/arnd/arm-soc.git randconfig/omap >>> >>> but I have not yet pulled them into the for-next branch. >>> >> Do you have any scripts to create these randconfigs ? >> These are useful to run on newer set of patches also to get all >> builds right first place. > > Yes, see the for-next+randconfig branch of > git://git.linaro.org/people/arnd/arm-soc.git. It has all my patches > and a randconfig.sh script. > > Right now, I'm trying to get a baseline upstream, since I have around 150 > patches that are needed to always build ten platforms successfully. > Ok. Will have a look at it. > The main problem is that you basically need all the patches I did in order > to find regressions, and some of the device driver patches are not currently > in a state where I could submit them. I hope that by the time of the 3.3 > merge window, I have enough patches upstream that you no longer need to > pull in an extra tree. > Sounds like a plan and having these scripts working on mainline kernel would be really great to test new set dependencies. Thanks a lot for the patches. Segards Santosh