From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: langwell: ensure alternate function is cleared
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:52:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E8C0CA7.2020907@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111004183710.GG2870@ponder.secretlab.ca>
On 04/10/11 21:37, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:36:07PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> Alternate function must be zero for the pin to act as
>> a GPIO.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter<adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox<alan@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
>> index d2eb57c..00692e8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
>> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ enum GPIO_REG {
>> GRER, /* rising edge detect */
>> GFER, /* falling edge detect */
>> GEDR, /* edge detect result */
>> + GAFR, /* alt function */
>> };
>>
>> struct lnw_gpio {
>> @@ -81,6 +82,31 @@ static void __iomem *gpio_reg(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
>> return ptr;
>> }
>>
>> +static void __iomem *gpio_reg_2bit(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
>> + enum GPIO_REG reg_type)
>> +{
>> + struct lnw_gpio *lnw = container_of(chip, struct lnw_gpio, chip);
>> + unsigned nreg = chip->ngpio / 32;
>> + u8 reg = offset / 16;
>> + void __iomem *ptr;
>> +
>> + ptr = (void __iomem *)(lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg * 4);
>
> This looks wrong. It looks to me like the __iomem annotation should
> be added to ->reg_base.
>
> Otherwise, the patch looks okay.
>
Deserves a separate patch...
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:29:27 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: langwell: declare reg_base as __iomem
reg_base is __iomem so add that to the declaration
and fix up assignment casts and types.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
index 00692e8..b7465e5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ enum GPIO_REG {
struct lnw_gpio {
struct gpio_chip chip;
- void *reg_base;
+ void __iomem *reg_base;
spinlock_t lock;
unsigned irq_base;
struct pci_dev *pdev;
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static void __iomem *gpio_reg(struct gpio_chip *chip,
unsigned offset,
u8 reg = offset / 32;
void __iomem *ptr;
- ptr = (void __iomem *)(lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg * 4);
+ ptr = lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg * 4;
return ptr;
}
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static void __iomem *gpio_reg_2bit(struct gpio_chip
*chip, unsigned offset,
u8 reg = offset / 16;
void __iomem *ptr;
- ptr = (void __iomem *)(lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg * 4);
+ ptr = lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg * 4;
return ptr;
}
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops lnw_gpio_pm_ops = {
static int __devinit lnw_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
const struct pci_device_id *id)
{
- void *base;
+ void __iomem *base;
int i;
resource_size_t start, len;
struct lnw_gpio *lnw;
@@ -324,8 +324,8 @@ static int __devinit lnw_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev
*pdev,
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error mapping bar1\n");
goto err3;
}
- irq_base = *(u32 *)base;
- gpio_base = *((u32 *)base + 1);
+ irq_base = *(__force u32 *)base;
+ gpio_base = *((__force u32 *)base + 1);
/* release the IO mapping, since we already get the info from bar1 */
iounmap(base);
/* get the register base from bar0 */
--
1.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-05 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-03 11:36 [PATCH] gpio: langwell: ensure alternate function is cleared Adrian Hunter
2011-10-04 18:37 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-05 7:52 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2011-10-05 16:58 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-06 6:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2011-10-06 10:19 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-06 10:15 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E8C0CA7.2020907@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox