From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
To: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
agk@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: request baset device mapper in Linux
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:13:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E8C11B0.30000@ce.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110929205748.GX19004@ics.muni.cz>
Hi Lukas,
On 09/30/11 05:57, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:50:08PM +0900, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
>> 2.6.32.36
>> no-multipath: 2.8 GB/s
>> multipath: 600 MB/s
>> multipath w/ patch: 2.8-2.9 GB/s
>>
>> 3.0.3
>> no-multipath: ??
>> multipath: 2.5 GB/s
>> multipath w/ patch: 2.5 GB/s(?)
>>
>> Have you tried 3.0.3 without multipath?
>
> yes, 3GB/s and only kwapd0 and kswapd1 is running, no kworker or ksoftirqd..
Hmm.. did you find any difference in your profile this time?
I'm trying to reproduce it myself but no success so far
(perhaps disks are not fast enough to saturate CPU on my test machine).
As ksoftirqd in top implies your CPU4 gets too much I/O completions,
'rq_affnity = 2' for both dm and SCSI devices might be a solution.
It'll distribute block completion softirqs to submitters and possibly
reduce the loads of the 1st CPU in the socket.
(See the commit below. It's a new feature of 3.1. Not available in 3.0...)
commit 5757a6d76cdf6dda2a492c09b985c015e86779b1
Author: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date: Sat Jul 23 20:44:25 2011 +0200
block: strict rq_affinity
Some systems benefit from completions always being steered to the strict
requester cpu rather than the looser "per-socket" steering that
blk_cpu_to_group() attempts by default. This is because the first
CPU in the group mask ends up being completely overloaded with work,
while the others (including the original submitter) has power left
to spare.
Allow the strict mode to be set by writing '2' to the sysfs control
file. This is identical to the scheme used for the nomerges file,
where '2' is a more aggressive setting than just being turned on.
echo 2 > /sys/block/<bdev>/queue/rq_affinity
Thanks,
--
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-05 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-20 8:26 request baset device mapper in Linux Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-07-21 11:11 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2011-07-21 13:26 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-07-22 6:56 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2011-07-22 8:19 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-07-23 7:28 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-07-24 22:16 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-08-01 9:31 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2011-09-08 13:27 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-09-15 18:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-09-16 14:08 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-09-19 5:50 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-09-29 20:57 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-10-05 8:13 ` Jun'ichi Nomura [this message]
2011-10-05 10:35 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-10-06 5:11 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E8C11B0.30000@ce.jp.nec.com \
--to=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=xhejtman@ics.muni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox