From: wwang <wei_wang@realsil.com.cn>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
"gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:rts_pstor:Fix SDIO issue
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:51:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E924F87.3080102@realsil.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111009135745.GO18470@longonot.mountain>
Dear Carpenter:
I will resend the patch
Best Regards,
wwang
于 2011年10月09日 21:57, Dan Carpenter 写道:
> What I'm saying is, it's confusing to add another variable which is
> only subtly different from retval. Here is what it looks like after
> we apply the patch.
>
> int reset_pass = 0;
>
> /* skip 45 lines */
>
> retval = sd_change_bank_voltage(chip, SD_IO_3V3);
> if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
> }
>
> /* skip 30 lines */
>
> if (!reset_pass)
> TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
>
> The reviewer would have to read through 80 lines of code to find that
> we don't care about the return value from sd_change_bank_voltage().
> Don't do it that way.
>
> Here is how I would write what it. I can't actually test this since
> I don't have the hardware...
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts_pstor/sd.c b/drivers/staging/rts_pstor/sd.c
> index fb62eaf..46bf0e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rts_pstor/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rts_pstor/sd.c
> @@ -3134,39 +3134,36 @@ int reset_sd_card(struct rtsx_chip *chip)
>
> if (chip->sd_ctl & RESET_MMC_FIRST) {
> retval = reset_mmc(chip);
> - if ((retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) && !sd_check_err_code(chip, SD_NO_CARD)) {
> + if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> + if (sd_check_err_code(chip, SD_NO_CARD))
> + TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
> +
> retval = reset_sd(chip);
> if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> - if (CHECK_PID(chip, 0x5209)) {
> - retval = sd_change_bank_voltage(chip, SD_IO_3V3);
> - if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> - TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
> - }
> - }
> + if (CHECK_PID(chip, 0x5209))
> + sd_change_bank_voltage(chip, SD_IO_3V3);
> + TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
> }
> }
> } else {
> retval = reset_sd(chip);
> if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> - if (sd_check_err_code(chip, SD_NO_CARD)) {
> + if (sd_check_err_code(chip, SD_NO_CARD))
> TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
> - }
>
> if (CHECK_PID(chip, 0x5209)) {
> retval = sd_change_bank_voltage(chip, SD_IO_3V3);
> - if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> + if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS)
> TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
> - }
> }
>
> - if (!chip->sd_io) {
> - retval = reset_mmc(chip);
> - }
> - }
> - }
> + if (chip->sd_io)
> + TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
>
> - if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> - TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
> + retval = reset_mmc(chip);
> + if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS)
> + TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
> + }
> }
>
> retval = sd_set_clock_divider(chip, SD_CLK_DIVIDE_0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-09 2:03 [PATCH] staging:rts_pstor:Fix SDIO issue wei_wang
2011-10-09 6:06 ` Dan Carpenter
2011-10-09 6:48 ` wwang
2011-10-09 13:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2011-10-10 1:51 ` wwang [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-10 1:51 wei_wang
2011-10-10 6:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2011-10-10 6:47 wei_wang
2011-10-10 7:55 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E924F87.3080102@realsil.com.cn \
--to=wei_wang@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox