Re: [RFC PATCH v3] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism

Mark Brown
2011-09-26T15:26:37Z

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 04:12:10PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:16:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > used but it's not a blocker for anything. Devices doing this would need
> > some way to figure out if they should -EBUSY or fail otherwise.

> Just to avoid confusion - ITYM -EAGAIN there. -EBUSY is already used
> by drivers to mean "someone else claimed a resource I need" be it the
> IO region or an IRQ resource...

Yes, I do - sorry.