From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752857Ab1JLPoE (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:44:04 -0400 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:45895 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751392Ab1JLPoB (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:44:01 -0400 Message-ID: <4E95B5C0.10606@goop.org> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:44:00 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110930 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Rusty Russell , Steven Rostedt , "David S. Miller" , David Daney , Michael Ellerman , Jan Glauber , Jason Baron , the arch/x86 maintainers , Xen Devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/8] stop_machine: make stop_machine safe and efficient to call early References: <619c66d6da63aa086e2eac017e7aed216cc8ddc3.1317755691.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> <8762k4grwy.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20111010073405.GC29035@elte.hu> <4E934F37.2020300@goop.org> <20111012073402.GJ18618@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20111012073402.GJ18618@elte.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/12/2011 12:34 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> On 10/10/2011 12:34 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> * Rusty Russell wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:18:03 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >>>>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge >>>>> >>>>> Make stop_machine() safe to call early in boot, before stop_machine() >>>>> has been set up, by simply calling the callback function directly if >>>>> there's only one CPU online. >>>> Not that you need this, since it's >90% Tejun's code now, but: >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Rusty Russell >>> hey, extra review is always useful. >>> >>> Jeremy, Tejun, what's the expected merge path of these changes? >> Andrew has already picked up the stop_machine patch, I think. But it's >> pretty settled now, so it shouldn't cause any problem if it gets via >> multiple paths. >> >> What about the jump-label stuff? Has that been going via tip.git in the >> past, or by some other path? > If it has Jason's and PeterZ's ack then it can go via any other tree > in this cycle - we are not carrying jump label patches right now. > > But those acks are very much desired. Jason has already Acked it, but then pointed out a couple of problems to address. I'll add PeterZ to the next repost. J