From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753589Ab1JNSib (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:38:31 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:47017 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751914Ab1JNSi3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:38:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4E98815F.6080105@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:37:19 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge CC: Jason Baron , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nick Piggin , Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , KVM , Andi Kleen , Xen Devel , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , konrad.wilk@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V5 00/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks References: <1318503245.24856.12.camel@twins> <4E971580.6030300@goop.org> <20111014141701.GA2433@redhat.com> <4E986B2B.60803@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <4E986B2B.60803@goop.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/14/2011 10:02 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > Jump labels are essentially binary: you can use path A or path B. pvops > are multiway: there's no limit to the number of potential number of > paravirtualized hypervisor implementations. At the moment we have 4: > native, Xen, KVM and lguest. > This isn't (or shouldn't be) really true... it should be possible to do an N-way jump label even if the current mechanism doesn't. -hpa