From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932477Ab1JNTKg (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:10:36 -0400 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:53011 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755785Ab1JNTKf (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:10:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4E988929.8040801@goop.org> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:10:33 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110930 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: Jason Baron , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nick Piggin , Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , KVM , Andi Kleen , Xen Devel , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , konrad.wilk@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V5 00/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks References: <1318503245.24856.12.camel@twins> <4E971580.6030300@goop.org> <20111014141701.GA2433@redhat.com> <4E986B2B.60803@goop.org> <4E98815F.6080105@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4E98815F.6080105@zytor.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/14/2011 11:37 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 10/14/2011 10:02 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> Jump labels are essentially binary: you can use path A or path B. pvops >> are multiway: there's no limit to the number of potential number of >> paravirtualized hypervisor implementations. At the moment we have 4: >> native, Xen, KVM and lguest. >> > This isn't (or shouldn't be) really true... it should be possible to do > an N-way jump label even if the current mechanism doesn't. We probably don't want all those implementations (near) inline, so they would end up being plain function calls anyway. J