public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Taraka R. Bodireddy" <tarak.reddy@in.ibm.com>,
	"Seshagiri N. Ippili" <seshagiri.ippili@in.ibm.com>,
	"Manvanthara B. Puttashankar" <mputtash@in.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Queue free fix (was Re: [PATCH] block: Free queue resources at blk_release_queue())
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:46:32 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9BEB68.1050707@ce.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318608184.3018.42.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>

On 10/15/11 01:03, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 15:09 +0200, Steffen Maier wrote:
>> This fix also went into 3.0.5 via
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=blob;f=releases/3.0.5/block-free-queue-resources-at-blk_release_queue.patch
>> (originated at http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=131669751909474&w=2 and 
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=131669414205696&w=2)
>>
>> However, it seems we still have a use-after-free bug, now causing the 
>> following oops with kernel 3.0.6 when removing paths to storage while 
>> generating load on device-mapper multipath disks:
>>
>>> Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address 6b6b6b6b6b6b6000
>>> Oops: 0038 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
>>> Modules linked in: iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables dm_round_robin sunrpc qeth_l3 binfmt_misc dm_multipath scsi_dh dm_mod ipv6 qeth ccwgroup [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
>>> CPU: 1 Not tainted 3.0.6-50.x.20111006-s390xdefault #1
>>> Process blast.LzS_64_SL (pid: 26613, task: 0000000063e2a398, ksp: 0000000064de3560)
>>> Krnl PSW : 0704100180000000 000000000048a038 (scsi_print_command+0x44/0xf8)
>>>            R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:1 PM:0 EA:3
>>> Krnl GPRS: 000000000000006b 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b 000000006717f800 000000000094f2e0
>>>            000000000061242e 000000000062bd88 0000000066fb90d8 0000000065391ad7
>>>            000000006717f800 000000006717f800 000000006716a090 000000006717f800
>>>            0000000000000004 0000000000672f88 0000000064de3838 0000000064de3808
>>> Krnl Code: 000000000048a026: f0b80004ebbf        srp     4(12,%r0),3007(%r14),8
>>>            000000000048a02c: f0a0000407f4        srp     4(11,%r0),2036,0
>>>            000000000048a032: e31020800004        lg      %r1,128(%r2)
>>>           >000000000048a038: e31010b00004        lg      %r1,176(%r1)
>>>            000000000048a03e: b9020011            ltgr    %r1,%r1
>>>            000000000048a042: a7840032            brc     8,48a0a6
>>>            000000000048a046: e33020000004        lg      %r3,0(%r2)
>>>            000000000048a04c: c04000182f4c        larl    %r4,78fee4
>>> Call Trace:
>>> ([<000000006717f800>] 0x6717f800)
>>>  [<0000000000487f28>] scsi_log_send+0xf0/0x130
>>>  [<000000000048824c>] scsi_dispatch_cmd+0xc8/0x4bc
>>>  [<0000000000490694>] scsi_request_fn+0x3b8/0x480
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but this seems to be saying that struct
> scsi_cmnd was used after free.  This looks to be a different problem
> because the command has a separate refcounting model which wasn't
> impacted by the change ... it could be we've just exposed yet another
> refcounting problem outside of the queue one.
> 
> If I had to guess, I'd say a bio got cloned with a SCSI command already
> attached, but the ref count on the SCSI command wasn't correctly
> adjusted.

As far as dm is concerned, it shouldn't happen.
Clone is made from a dm request, not from SCSI one.
Also clone is not reused when retrying.

>> Initially, we encountered use-after-free bugs in
>> scsi_print_command / scsi_dispatch_cmd
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=130824013229933&w=2

It is interesting that both this and the older report
got oopsed in scsi_log_send(), while there are other
dereferences of 'cmd' around scsi_dispatch_cmd().
Are there any reason they are special? Just by accident?

Thanks,
-- 
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-17  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <201109221318.p8MDIXPP020015@pentland.suse.de>
2011-09-28  0:47 ` [PATCH] block: Free queue resources at blk_release_queue() Jens Axboe
2011-09-28  0:55   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-09-28  1:15     ` Jens Axboe
2011-09-28  1:59       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-09-28  2:02         ` Jens Axboe
2011-09-28  4:10         ` James Bottomley
2011-09-28 14:08           ` Jens Axboe
2011-09-28 14:11             ` James Bottomley
2011-09-28 14:14               ` [GIT PULL] Queue free fix (was Re: [PATCH] block: Free queue resources at blk_release_queue()) Jens Axboe
2011-09-28 15:22                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-09-28 15:43                   ` James Bottomley
2011-09-28 17:48                     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-28 17:53                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-28 18:09                         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-28 18:16                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-28 19:05                             ` Eric Seppanen
2011-09-28 19:14                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-30 10:18                               ` Jens Axboe
2011-11-30 10:26                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-28 22:34                             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-28 17:59                       ` James Bottomley
2011-10-13 13:09                 ` Steffen Maier
2011-10-14 16:03                   ` James Bottomley
2011-10-17  8:46                     ` Jun'ichi Nomura [this message]
2011-10-17 14:06                       ` James Bottomley
2011-10-18 13:31                         ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-10-18 15:45                           ` Heiko Carstens
2011-10-18 16:29                             ` James Bottomley
2011-10-31 10:05                               ` Heiko Carstens
2011-10-31 10:42                                 ` James Bottomley
2011-10-31 11:46                                   ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-10-31 13:00                                     ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-02 12:37                                       ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-11-02 12:44                                         ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-11-02 13:47                                         ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-04  4:07                                           ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-11-04  9:12                                             ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-03 18:25                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-04  9:19                                         ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-04 13:30                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-04 13:37                                             ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-11-07 11:31                                             ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-11-07 13:42                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-07 12:23                                             ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-07 11:30                                           ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-11-07 15:36                                             ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-07 16:43                                               ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-07 17:10                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-07 21:44                                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-09  9:37                                           ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-11-10 16:10                                             ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-17 16:29                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-29 12:00                                                 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-29 20:18                                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-30  7:25                                                     ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-12-12 12:39                                                     ` Heiko Carstens
2011-12-13 16:50                                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2011-10-31 13:21                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2011-10-31 13:40                                     ` Heiko Carstens
2011-10-31 14:01                                       ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E9BEB68.1050707@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --to=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mputtash@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=seshagiri.ippili@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tarak.reddy@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox