From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754211Ab1JXJOi (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:14:38 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45162 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753344Ab1JXJOh (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:14:37 -0400 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Message-ID: <4EA52C78.3030105@cam.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:14:32 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Carpenter CC: Maxin B John , Jonathan Cameron , Dan Carpenter , Bryan Freed , public-linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@plane.gmane.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , public-linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@plane.gmane.org, Arnd Bergmann , public-devel-gWbeCf7V1WCQmaza687I9mD2FQJk+8+b@plane.gmane.org, Amit Kucheria Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: light: Fix compiler warning in tsl2563.c References: <20110902094107.GA2846@maxin> <4E60B63C.1030101@cam.ac.uk> <4EA52710.2060108@cam.ac.uk> <20111024090143.GB3526@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20111024090143.GB3526@mwanda> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/24/11 10:01, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:51:28AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>>> Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John >>>> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron >>>> >>> >>> Sorry for the delay in replying to this mail. I am curious about the >>> status of this patch. I couldn't locate this patch at iio-blue.git as >>> it is not present in kernel.org now >>> (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio-blue.git;a=summary) >>> Please ignore this mail if you have already added this patch to your tree. >> Ah, sorry I slipped up here and should have noticed it didn't go directly to >> Greg. Just to check, with everyone I have author as Dan, reporter as Maxin >> and have signed off myself (it's going through my tree anyway now). >> >> I think from looking back it was Dan's suggestion in response to Maxin's >> patch. Hence convention would be a sign off from Dan and perhaps an >> Ack from Maxin? >> > > Maxim is the author. He didn't resend this in the proper way so it > was confusing... Can you give me a Reviewed-by tag? > > Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter > Sure.