From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754390Ab1JXJ2Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:28:24 -0400 Received: from e28smtp01.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.1]:48068 "EHLO e28smtp01.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753833Ab1JXJ2X (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:28:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4EA52FCF.2090508@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:58:47 +0530 From: Raghavendra K T User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110928 Fedora/3.1.15-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Raghavendra K T , KVM , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Sedat Dilek , Virtualization , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Dave Jiang , Thomas Gleixner , Stefano Stabellini , Gleb Natapov , Yinghai Lu , Marcelo Tosatti , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity , Rik van Riel , Xen , LKML , Suzuki Poulose , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/5] debugfs: Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32 References: <20111023190307.16364.35381.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> <20111023190459.16364.98151.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> <20111023221920.GA591@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20111023221920.GA591@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/24/2011 03:49 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:34:59AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32. > > Why not just rename when you move the functions? Why the extra step? > Intention was only clarity. Yes, if this patch is an overhead, I 'll combine both the patches. > greg k-h >