From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932544Ab1KCDVa (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 23:21:30 -0400 Received: from oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.55.9]:35517 "HELO oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752031Ab1KCDV1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 23:21:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4EB208AB.6030903@tao.ma> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:21:15 +0800 From: Tao Ma User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig CC: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 for 3.2] fs/direct-io.c: Calculate fs_count correctly in get_more_blocks. References: <1320200794-2881-1-git-send-email-tm@tao.ma> <20111102073632.GA17580@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20111102073632.GA17580@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1390:box585.bluehost.com:colyli:tao.ma} {sentby:smtp auth 182.92.247.2 authed with tm@tao.ma} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/02/2011 03:36 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The patch looks good to me, but given that it neither fixes a bug > nor a regression I'd probably call it 3.3 material at this point. OK, so you will take it or I should ask Andrew to take it for now? Thanks Tao