linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Foley <pefoley2@verizon.net>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] UML changes for 3.2
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:18:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB3134E.8080102@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320358228.14409.279.camel@x61.thuisdomein>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 752 bytes --]

Am 03.11.2011 23:10, schrieb Paul Bolle:
> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 22:56 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> These Makefiles always make me nervous. Is SUBARCH set by the time the
>> update-po-config target is run? If so, we could simply do "env SUBARCH=
>> $(SUBARCH) [...]". But how do I check that SUBARCH really is set (ie,
>> that I'm not passing env an empty string)?
> 
> It seems the trick here should be
>     env SUBARCH=$(KBUILD_BUILDHOST) [...]
> 
> Michal, does that make sense?
> 

Beware, it's also possible to set it by hand.
E.g. for building a i386 UML on x86_64.
make linux ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386.

As long no inclusion of another Kconfig file depends on SUBARCH, setting
it to the empty string is ok.

Thanks,
//richard


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-03 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-02 14:10 [GIT PULL] UML changes for 3.2 Richard Weinberger
2011-11-03 19:32 ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-03 20:41   ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-03 21:01     ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-03 21:15       ` Richard Weinberger
2011-11-03 21:25         ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-03 21:37           ` Richard Weinberger
2011-11-03 21:56             ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-03 22:10               ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-03 22:18                 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2011-11-04 10:41                 ` Michal Marek
2011-11-05 11:48                   ` Paul Bolle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EB3134E.8080102@nod.at \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=pefoley2@verizon.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).