From: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Robert Lee <rob.lee@linaro.org>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, len.brown@intel.com, hpa@linux.intel.com,
daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, amit.kucheria@linaro.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pm: remove useless array definition in cpuidle_structure
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:51:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB3D8BE.7050600@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320356693-18982-1-git-send-email-rob.lee@linaro.org>
On Friday 04 November 2011 03:14 AM, Robert Lee wrote:
> From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>
> All the modules name are ro-data, it is never copied to the array.
>
> eg.
>
> static struct cpuidle_driver intel_idle_driver = {
> .name = "intel_idle",
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> };
>
> It safe to assign the pointer of this ro-data to a const char *.
> By this way we save 12 bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Lee <rob.lee@linaro.org>
> ---
> include/linux/cpuidle.h | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> index b51629e..16f9dce 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> @@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ static inline int cpuidle_get_last_residency(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> ****************************/
>
> struct cpuidle_driver {
> - char name[CPUIDLE_NAME_LEN];
> - struct module *owner;
> + const char *name;
> + struct module *owner;
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
This looks good, and makes it fool-proof by not allowing one to tamper the name of the driver.
Tested OK on x86 (both Intel idle and ACPI)
Tested-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-04 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-03 21:44 [PATCH] pm: remove useless array definition in cpuidle_structure Robert Lee
2011-11-04 12:21 ` Deepthi Dharwar [this message]
2011-11-04 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-07 18:59 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB3D8BE.7050600@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rob.lee@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox