From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932346Ab1KDNSg (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:18:36 -0400 Received: from smtpfb1-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.9]:39189 "EHLO smtpfb1-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755143Ab1KDNSf (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:18:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4EB3E5F9.80308@free.fr> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:17:45 +0100 From: Daniel Lezcano User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Bottomley CC: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , mk@cm4all.com, "containers@lists.linux-foundation.org" , nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp, oleg@redhat.com, Michal Hocko , "hannes@cmpxchg.org" , tj@kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, paul@paulmenage.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] add new cgroup list to CC notice References: <20111104094030.cf8d5860.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <4EB3495B.8080700@free.fr> <1320382250.3108.4.camel@dabdike> In-Reply-To: <1320382250.3108.4.camel@dabdike> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/04/2011 05:50 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 03:09 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 11/04/2011 01:40 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: >>> As discussed at Kernel Summit(2011), new cgroups mailing list is opened by >>> James. This list is for discussing general cgroup design and patches >>> including all subsystems and for getting more attentions to cgroups/namespaces >>> related issues by developpers. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki >>> --- >> I don't see the point to unilaterally change the mailing list to >> vger.kernel.org as the discussions will be the same as the actual >> mailing list containers@. > It's not a unilateral list change. We will still have containers@lf. > > The problem is that not all cgroup related stuff goes over it ... > particularly the currently active controller discussions tend not to be > cc'd there. With systemd (and things like the I/O controllers for > xen/kvm), cgroups is seen as being wider than containers. > > The desire was for a single list where someone could go to get an > overall view of what's going on in cgroups ... particularly if you're a > confused subsystem maintainer who just had a request to put a controller > in your subsystem ... Ok, thanks for the clarification. May I suggest to create also a namespace@ mailing list ?