public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] btrfs: Don't leak mem in scrub_fixup().
@ 2011-11-06 22:33 Jesper Juhl
  2011-11-07  9:24 ` Arne Jansen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Juhl @ 2011-11-06 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Mason, linux-btrfs; +Cc: linux-kernel

It seems to me that we may leak the memory allocated to 'multi' in
scrub_fixup() if, for example, 'length' turns out to be less than
PAGE_SIZE after we call btrfs_map_block(). This patch should take care
of the leak by always kfree'ing 'multi' before we return in that error
case.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
---
 fs/btrfs/scrub.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

 Compile tested only since I don't have any btrfs filesystems to test on.

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index a8d03d5..b53433e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ static void scrub_fixup(struct scrub_bio *sbio, int ix)
 	ret = btrfs_map_block(map_tree, REQ_WRITE, logical, &length,
 			      &multi, 0);
 	if (ret || !multi || length < PAGE_SIZE) {
+		kfree(multi);
 		printk(KERN_ERR
 		       "scrub_fixup: btrfs_map_block failed us for %llu\n",
 		       (unsigned long long)logical);
-- 
1.7.7.2


-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>       http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Don't leak mem in scrub_fixup().
  2011-11-06 22:33 [PATCH] btrfs: Don't leak mem in scrub_fixup() Jesper Juhl
@ 2011-11-07  9:24 ` Arne Jansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Arne Jansen @ 2011-11-07  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jesper Juhl; +Cc: Chris Mason, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel

On 06.11.2011 23:33, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> It seems to me that we may leak the memory allocated to 'multi' in
> scrub_fixup() if, for example, 'length' turns out to be less than
> PAGE_SIZE after we call btrfs_map_block(). This patch should take care
> of the leak by always kfree'ing 'multi' before we return in that error
> case.

Thanks for looking into this. The current pull request already contains
a fix for this, from Ilya Dryomov.

-Arne

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/scrub.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
>  Compile tested only since I don't have any btrfs filesystems to test on.
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> index a8d03d5..b53433e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ static void scrub_fixup(struct scrub_bio *sbio, int ix)
>  	ret = btrfs_map_block(map_tree, REQ_WRITE, logical, &length,
>  			      &multi, 0);
>  	if (ret || !multi || length < PAGE_SIZE) {
> +		kfree(multi);
>  		printk(KERN_ERR
>  		       "scrub_fixup: btrfs_map_block failed us for %llu\n",
>  		       (unsigned long long)logical);


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-07  9:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-06 22:33 [PATCH] btrfs: Don't leak mem in scrub_fixup() Jesper Juhl
2011-11-07  9:24 ` Arne Jansen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox