From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933029Ab1KGQaV (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:30:21 -0500 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:45243 "EHLO mail.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932790Ab1KGQaU (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:30:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4EB80788.9080305@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:30:00 -0500 From: Paul Gortmaker User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonas Gorski CC: , David Woodhouse , , Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD: MAPS: bcm963xx-flash.c: explicitly include module.h References: <1320580651-4860-1-git-send-email-jonas.gorski@gmail.com> <20111107012643.GG30282@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [128.224.146.65] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11-11-07 05:12 AM, Jonas Gorski wrote: > HI Paul, > > On 7 November 2011 02:26, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> On 06/11/2011 (Sun 12:57) Jonas Gorski wrote: >>> This patch is based on next-20111104 and probably should go through Paul's module.h cleanup tree. >> >> I can put it in the module.h tree, but for files that are using module.h >> stuff, they can simply add it via the normal maintainer flow, since >> files that use modular stuff should include module.h regardless and >> there are no dependencies on the module.h content for things like this. > > I'm fine with either (though going through the MTD-tree will probably > warrant a resubmission with a shortened changelog as it doesn't break > there (yet)). OK, I'll grab it and put it in the small post-merge queue that I'll be sending in a couple of hours. P. > > @David, any preference there? Should I resubmit? > > Regards > Jonas