From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754200Ab1KJSTJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:19:09 -0500 Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:35236 "EHLO mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754002Ab1KJSTC (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:19:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4EBC1592.2060307@garzik.org> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:18:58 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , Anton Vorontsov , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (ata/pata_of_platform.c) References: <20111011201127.455df266dcbffb1d621f8576@canb.auug.org.au> <4E94A920.40503@xenotime.net> <4E987829.3080104@xenotime.net> <20111110135703.GA23609@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20111110135703.GA23609@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/10/2011 08:57 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 10/11/2011 01:37 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 10/11/11 02:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> The linux-next tree is now available from >>>> git://github.com/sfrothwell/linux-next.git as a temporary measure while >>>> the kernel.org servers are unavailable. >>>> >>>> It may also turn up on git.kernel.org (depending on the mirroring). The >>>> patch set is still absent, however. >>>> >>>> Changes since 20111007: >>>> >>>> Removed tree: ide (at the maintainer's request) >>> >>> >>> drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c:55:13: error: 'NO_IRQ' undeclared (first use in this function) >> >> >> [adding Author: Anton] >> >> Build error still present in linux-next of 20111014. > > This build failure regression report was ignored twice and then > pushed upstream and is still unfixed a month after the initial > report. Upstream now fails to build on like 25% of x86 configs. > > What's going on with this bug guys? Hum, I missed it in my LKML scans, and never got a CC. Will merge Anton's patch immediately... Jeff