From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752994Ab1KNIKv (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 03:10:51 -0500 Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.38]:41652 "EHLO smtprelay04.ispgateway.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751997Ab1KNIKr (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 03:10:47 -0500 Message-ID: <4EC0CD04.4090107@ladisch.de> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:10:44 +0100 From: Clemens Ladisch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Klaus Ripke CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LOAD_FREQ (4*HZ+61) avoids loadavg Moire References: <20111112143825.GX6192@aine.Speedport_W_502V_Typ_A> In-Reply-To: <20111112143825.GX6192@aine.Speedport_W_502V_Typ_A> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Df-Sender: bGludXgta2VybmVsQGNsLmRvbWFpbmZhY3Rvcnkta3VuZGUuZGU= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Klaus Ripke wrote: > With some seconds based load (like SSL heartbeats) > and LOAD_FREQ at (5*HZ+1) I see Moire patterns like inverse sawtooth, Thanks for researching this, but I don't see them because I'm too lazy to reproduce this. Could you please publish a colorful screenshot somewhere? > I suggest (4*HZ+61) for a better distribution. It appears your attached patch got lost somehow. ;-) Regards, Clemens