From: Natanji <natanji@gmail.com>
To: maciej.rutecki@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression in thinkpad-acpi events
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:44:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC16F8E.7060601@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201111142031.06663.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
With 3.0 it was still fine, that much is for sure. The problem came
with the upgrade to 3.1. I've never even compiled my own kernel so I
cannot bisect. Sorry...
Regards,
Natanji
On Mon 14 Nov 2011 08:31:06 PM CET, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
> On środa, 9 listopada 2011 o 19:17:25 Natanji wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>> first time posting on this last, and I'm not subscribed, so please CC
>> any replies to me. ;)
>>
>> I'm running Kernel version 3.1-4 using Arch Linux (32 Bit) on a Thinkpad
>> X60 Tablet. Since upgrading from a pre-3.1 kernel to a post-3.1 kernel,
>> the Thinkpad-specific ACPI events (from thinkpad-acpi) are completely gone.
>>
>> This can be observed by using the acpi_listen command. For instance, no
>> ACPI events happen when swiveling the display, and the sleep button returns
>> button/sleep SBTN 00000080 00000000
>> instead of the previous
>> ibm/hotkey HKEY 00000080 00001004
>>
>> The bug was reported in the Arch Linux bugtracker [1] and it was
>> suggested to report this upstream, so this is what I did now. Sadly I
>> have no idea how I could find out if this is indeed a kernel bug or not;
>> I have never compiled my own kernel so what I can give you is probably
>> limited. But I suppose quite a few members of this list use a Thinkpad.
>> If there is anything else I can help out with, just tell me.
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=26658
>
> Can you check that 3.1 works or not? Or try bisection that it is regression
> after 3.0 or 3.1 kernel.
>
> Regards
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-14 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-09 18:17 Regression in thinkpad-acpi events Natanji
2011-11-14 19:31 ` Maciej Rutecki
2011-11-14 19:44 ` Natanji [this message]
2011-11-14 20:18 ` Maciej Rutecki
2011-11-15 7:09 ` Tom Gundersen
2011-11-15 23:03 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-11-24 9:25 ` Tom Gundersen
2011-11-25 0:25 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-11-27 1:23 ` [ibm-acpi-devel] " Henning Schild
2011-11-30 9:22 ` Natanji
2011-11-30 11:15 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-11-30 13:34 ` Natanji
2011-11-14 20:30 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-11-14 21:52 ` Natanji
2011-11-15 2:39 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC16F8E.7060601@gmail.com \
--to=natanji@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox