From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756103Ab1KNToP (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:44:15 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:56020 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756087Ab1KNToN (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:44:13 -0500 Message-ID: <4EC16F8E.7060601@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:44:14 +0100 From: Natanji User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: maciej.rutecki@gmail.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Regression in thinkpad-acpi events References: <4EBAC3B5.5060405@gmail.com> <201111142031.06663.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201111142031.06663.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org With 3.0 it was still fine, that much is for sure. The problem came with the upgrade to 3.1. I've never even compiled my own kernel so I cannot bisect. Sorry... Regards, Natanji On Mon 14 Nov 2011 08:31:06 PM CET, Maciej Rutecki wrote: > On środa, 9 listopada 2011 o 19:17:25 Natanji wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> first time posting on this last, and I'm not subscribed, so please CC >> any replies to me. ;) >> >> I'm running Kernel version 3.1-4 using Arch Linux (32 Bit) on a Thinkpad >> X60 Tablet. Since upgrading from a pre-3.1 kernel to a post-3.1 kernel, >> the Thinkpad-specific ACPI events (from thinkpad-acpi) are completely gone. >> >> This can be observed by using the acpi_listen command. For instance, no >> ACPI events happen when swiveling the display, and the sleep button returns >> button/sleep SBTN 00000080 00000000 >> instead of the previous >> ibm/hotkey HKEY 00000080 00001004 >> >> The bug was reported in the Arch Linux bugtracker [1] and it was >> suggested to report this upstream, so this is what I did now. Sadly I >> have no idea how I could find out if this is indeed a kernel bug or not; >> I have never compiled my own kernel so what I can give you is probably >> limited. But I suppose quite a few members of this list use a Thinkpad. >> If there is anything else I can help out with, just tell me. >> >> [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=26658 > > Can you check that 3.1 works or not? Or try bisection that it is regression > after 3.0 or 3.1 kernel. > > Regards