From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932314Ab1KOUxq (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:53:46 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50532 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932245Ab1KOUxp (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:53:45 -0500 Message-ID: <4EC2D182.2000702@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:54:26 +0100 From: Michal Marek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Bolle Cc: Jiri Kosina , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How to remove 2000+ lines from 400+ defconfig files? References: <1321362602.20271.192.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <1321371462.20271.201.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <4EC2B1F7.6090108@suse.cz> <1321385174.20271.222.camel@x61.thuisdomein> In-Reply-To: <1321385174.20271.222.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dne 15.11.2011 20:26, Paul Bolle napsal(a): > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 19:39 +0100, Michal Marek wrote: >>> Since, if one is >>> supposed to feed them to the config tools first it doesn't matter >>> whether the (outdated) macros are still used somewhere in the code, >>> doesn't it? The config tools will simply drop all macros they can't >>> match with Kconfig symbols. (Or don't they? Michal?) >> >> Yes, they will not appear in the .config. > > So the fact that a few of these macros are still currently used in the > code shouldn't bother us. The maintainers of that code have no reason to > complain about dropping those macros from the various defconfig files, > because that removal doesn't actually matter. Correct? Correct. Michal