From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757384Ab1KRJ5J (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 04:57:09 -0500 Received: from e23smtp07.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.140]:41058 "EHLO e23smtp07.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751917Ab1KRJ5H (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 04:57:07 -0500 Message-ID: <4EC62BEA.9040007@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:56:58 +0800 From: Xiao Guangrong User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110930 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sasha Levin CC: Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , LKML , KVM Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: optimize memslots searching References: <4EC6226B.3080408@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1321609310.8010.28.camel@lappy> In-Reply-To: <1321609310.8010.28.camel@lappy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 11111723-0260-0000-0000-0000000ED34D Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/18/2011 05:41 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: >> autotest for RHEL.6.1 setup/boot/reboot/shutdown(average): >> ept=1: before: 449.5 after: 447.8 >> ept=0: before: 532.7 after: 529.8 >> >> kernbench(average): >> ept=1: before: 127.94 after: 126.98 >> ept=0: before: 196.85 after: 189.66 > > Hi, > > Do these patches depend on any other patches? Looks like they don't > apply on kvm-next. > Ah, i forgot that i was using Avi's kvm tree, this patchset is just base on that, to avoid noise, i'll rebase it after it is reviewed. Thank you, Sasha!