From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758471Ab1KWEbH (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:31:07 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46680 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756388Ab1KWEbF (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:31:05 -0500 Message-ID: <4ECC76F3.9050001@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:30:43 +0800 From: Cong Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg , Hugh Dickins , Dave Hansen , Lennart Poettering , Kay Sievers , KOSAKI Motohiro , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH] tmpfs: add fallocate support References: <1321612791-4764-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <20111122140630.9f37c907.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20111122140630.9f37c907.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 于 2011年11月23日 06:06, Andrew Morton 写道: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:39:50 +0800 > Cong Wang wrote: > >> It seems that systemd needs tmpfs to support fallocate, >> see http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/20/275. This patch adds >> fallocate support to tmpfs. >> >> As we already have shmem_truncate_range(), it is also easy >> to add FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE support too. >> >> >> ... >> >> +static long shmem_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, >> + loff_t offset, loff_t len) >> +{ >> + struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode; >> + pgoff_t start = offset>> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT; >> + pgoff_t end = DIV_ROUND_UP((offset + len), PAGE_CACHE_SIZE); >> + pgoff_t index = start; >> + loff_t i_size = i_size_read(inode); >> + struct page *page = NULL; >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); > > It would be saner and less racy-looking to read i_size _after_ taking > i_mutex. > > And if you do that, there's no need to use i_size_read() - just a plain > old > > i_size = inode->i_size; > > is OK. Fair enough, I will fix that in V3. Thanks, Andrew!