From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, JBottomley@parallels.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: prevent inlining in arxescsi.c causing build failures
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:46:11 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED75AF3.2090901@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111201080613.GF26618@pengutronix.de>
Hello.
On 01.12.2011 12:06, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> The following failure is seen in routine coverage builds:
>> CC [M] drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.o
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s: Assembler messages:
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:334: Error: symbol `.loop_1' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:337: Error: symbol `.loop_2' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:343: Error: symbol `.loop_3' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:365: Error: symbol `.loop_1' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:368: Error: symbol `.loop_2' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:374: Error: symbol `.loop_3' is already defined
>> make[4]: *** [drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.o] Error 1
>> It is caused by multiple inline of arxescsi_pseudo_dma_write()
>> which is responsible for the above labels. Marking the fcn
>> as non-inline fixes the issue.
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> Is that a compiler or a code issue? If it's the compiler please fix
> that. If it's the code, then please document why you added the noinline.
> Having said that, "my" compiler compiles drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.o
> just fine (using rpc_defconfig on v3.2-rc2).
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c b/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
>> index a750aa7..2608a9e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
>> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ arxescsi_dma_setup(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_pointer *SCp,
>> return fasdma_pseudo;
>> }
>>
>> -static void arxescsi_pseudo_dma_write(unsigned char *addr, void __iomem *base)
>> +static noinline void
>> +arxescsi_pseudo_dma_write(unsigned char *addr, void __iomem *base)
> Shouldn't this line get some indention?
No, usually such lines don't get indented.
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-01 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-01 4:26 [PATCH] arm: prevent inlining in arxescsi.c causing build failures Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-01 8:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-12-01 10:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2011-12-01 14:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-22 19:16 Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ED75AF3.2090901@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox