From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751520Ab1LEFkm (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 00:40:42 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7255 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750761Ab1LEFkl (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 00:40:41 -0500 Message-ID: <4EDC594D.5040008@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:40:29 +0800 From: Cong Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: Please add my tree to linux-next References: <4ED8529E.5070608@redhat.com> <20111205100930.1bedc458a5e78b85c563465d@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20111205100930.1bedc458a5e78b85c563465d@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 于 2011年12月05日 07:09, Stephen Rothwell 写道: > Hi, > > On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:22:54 +0800 Cong Wang wrote: >> >> As Andrew Morton suggested, please add my tree which contains all >> of my patches for kmap_atomic() [1] to linux-next. Some of the >> individual patches already got ACK from subsystem maintainers. >> The tree is hosted on github: >> >> git://github.com/congwang/linux.git #kmap_atomic > > I have added this tree to linux-next today. > > Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As > you may know, this is not a judgment of your code. The purpose of > linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of > conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. > > You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have > been: > * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's > Signed-off-by, When I sent the patches out, they all have my Signed-off-by, but not in the commit logs in my tree. Is this a problem? > * posted to the relevant mailing list, Yes, see http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/27/2. > * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree), Yes. > * successfully unit tested, and Yes, compile-tested on x86_64 and ppc. > * destined for the current or next Linux merge window. Yes, for next merge window. > > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him > to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary. > Ok. Thanks!