public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, <mingo@elte.hu>,
	William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>,
	Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] perf: x86 RDPMC and RDTSC support
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:17:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDD50F5.30300@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EDD26B9.8070007@fb.com>

On 12/5/11 12:16 PM, Arun Sharma wrote:
> On 12/2/11 2:22 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> Have you tried with inheritance disabled?
>> I don't remember if perf stat has it enabled buy default.
>
> Disabling inheritance using the -i switch as in:
>
> (for i in `seq 1 10`; do numactl --cpunodebind 1 perf stat -i -e
> instructions ./lat_ctx -P1 -s32k 4; done)
>
> shows numbers closer to baseline, since the threads used for
> benchmarking are not counting events.

I spent some more time looking into this. Running:

perf stat -e instructions  ./lat_ctx -P1 -s32k 4 -N 1000000 &
perf record -ag -- sleep 3

didn't show high cycles counts on any perf_events related functions in 
the context switch path. The only PMU related stuff that showed up had 
to do with x86_pmu_enable called from an IPI.

So just as an experiment I disabled perf_rotate_context() via:

--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4252,8 +4252,6 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)
         curr->sched_class->task_tick(rq, curr, 0);
         raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);

-       perf_event_task_tick();
-

That seems to bring the lat_ctx numbers very close to baseline.

I suspect that some optimizations are possible in perf_rotate_context 
that don't involve enabling/disabling the PMU via an IPI for simple 
cases that involve one or two hardware events (eg: fixed counters).

  -Arun

Sample stack trace:

lat_ctx 29874 [012] 350729.824173: cycles:
         ffffffff8101149c intel_pmu_enable_all ([kernel.kallsyms])
         ffffffff810115f7 intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all ([kernel.kallsyms])
         ffffffff8100e877 x86_pmu_enable ([kernel.kallsyms])
         ffffffff810a99de perf_pmu_enable ([kernel.kallsyms])
         ffffffff8100d682 x86_pmu_commit_txn ([kernel.kallsyms])
         ffffffff810aa4f9 group_sched_in ([kernel.kallsyms])
         ffffffff810ab06d __perf_event_enable ([kernel.kallsyms])
         ffffffff810a8c93 remote_function ([kernel.kallsyms])
         ffffffff81065eec generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt 
([kernel.kallsyms])
         ffffffff81018064 smp_call_function_single_interrupt 
([kernel.kallsyms])
         ffffffff81461fcb call_function_single_interrupt ([kernel.kallsyms])
                   401ec4 bread (/root/lat_ctx)


  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-05 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-21 14:51 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] perf: x86 RDPMC and RDTSC support Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-21 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] perf: Update the mmap control page on mmap() Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-21 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] perf, arch: Rework perf_event_index() Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-21 16:22   ` Eric B Munson
2011-11-21 17:23   ` Will Deacon
2011-11-21 19:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-21 20:31       ` Will Deacon
2011-11-21 20:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-21 22:43           ` Will Deacon
2011-11-22 11:26             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-22 11:47               ` Will Deacon
2011-11-22 11:49                 ` Oleg Strikov
2011-11-22 11:52                   ` Will Deacon
2011-11-22 11:56                     ` Oleg Strikov
2011-11-22 12:00                     ` Oleg Strikov
2011-11-22 12:14                       ` Will Deacon
2011-11-22 12:25                         ` Oleg Strikov
2011-11-22 11:51                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-22 11:54                   ` Will Deacon
2011-11-22 11:48               ` Oleg Strikov
2011-11-21 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] perf, x86: Implement userspace RDPMC Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-21 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] perf, x86: Provide means of disabling " Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-21 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] perf: Extend the mmap control page with time (TSC) fields Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-28 17:55   ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-21 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] perf, tools: X86 RDPMC, RDTSC test Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-21 15:29   ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-21 15:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-21 16:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-21 17:42         ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-21 15:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] perf: x86 RDPMC and RDTSC support Vince Weaver
2011-11-21 16:05   ` William Cohen
2011-11-21 16:08   ` William Cohen
2011-12-02 19:26 ` Arun Sharma
2011-12-02 22:22   ` Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 20:16     ` Arun Sharma
2011-12-05 23:17       ` Arun Sharma [this message]
2011-12-06  1:38         ` Stephane Eranian
2011-12-06  9:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 21:53           ` Arun Sharma
2011-12-16 22:36 ` Vince Weaver
2011-12-21 12:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-21 13:15     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-23 20:12       ` Vince Weaver
2011-12-21 15:04     ` Vince Weaver
2011-12-21 21:32       ` Vince Weaver
2011-12-21 21:41         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-21 22:19           ` Vince Weaver
2011-12-21 22:32             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EDD50F5.30300@fb.com \
    --to=asharma@fb.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=vince@deater.net \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox