From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753530Ab1LLXZb (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:25:31 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:43211 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752023Ab1LLXZ3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:25:29 -0500 Message-ID: <4EE68D57.7030603@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:25:11 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "Brown, Len" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org CC: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pjones@redhat.com Subject: Re: Re-add ibft tree to linux-next please References: <20111212145330.GA16278@andromeda.dapyr.net> In-Reply-To: <20111212145330.GA16278@andromeda.dapyr.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/12/2011 06:53 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Hey Stephen, > > I've one patch for the iBFT and since I am the co-maintainer of said tree, > please add this tree to your awesome build system: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/ibft.git > > The branch is "linux-next" > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > CC: Peter Jones > Thanks! > > P.S. > After kernel.org went down, I choose not to resurface the iBFT tree b/c I > figured that the driver was sooo stable that there would be no need for any > patches. Well, not the case iBFT is basically an ACPI table with nonstandard discovery. Any way we could get this merged into the ACPI core eventually? -hpa