From: Chris Palmer <chris.palmer@pobox.com>
To: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@numble.net>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] ASUS Sandybridge motherboards + PCI not working (IRQ n: nobody cared)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:49:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE87F47.7020500@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADdbW+E9=DKZ-839yPW_R4JM1omXEzqGqT=ae7Txu4Jikyw2=A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Edward
Thanks for the reply. See below...
Regards
Chris
On 14/12/2011 00:06, Edward Donovan wrote:
> Hi Chris -
>
> I will certainly take a look. I don't have the hardware,
> unfortunately. And
> this is kinda my first rodeo, kernel-wise, so don't let me sound too
> expert. :)
> Let me ask a couple questions, anyway.
>
> - Later, I'll have time to look for Andrew's message, but do you know
> -- did he
> mean a firmware ACPI bug, or a Linux bug?
He didn't say.
>
> - Does 2.6.38 behave the same as 3.1.5 or the other newest kernels?
> (If the
> hardware doesn't require something newer than .38.) There was an
> IRQ overhaul
> in 2.6.39, and the two bugs I fixed were regressions from that
> work. As of
> now, the bad-irq handling seems equivalent to 2.6.38, but I should
> make sure
> that goes for your problem, too.
I was on 2.6.39.2 when I purchased the motherboard, so can't personally
vouch for anything earlier. However other posters, who were on earlier
kernels, referred to the behaviour that I am now experiencing on 3.1.5 -
i.e. that the "nobody cared" fault occurs and the device then continues
to "work" but extremely slowly (from 2.6.39.2-3.1.4 it stops working
completely).
>
> I think I'll cc LKML, too, if you don't mind. I've seen this topic
> going by,
> but don't know what's been said. And maybe tomorrow I can get some
> pondering
> time -
>
> Ed
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-14 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-14 11:04 [PROBLEM] ASUS Sandybridge motherboards + PCI not working (IRQ n: nobody cared) Chris Palmer
2011-10-15 0:29 ` Robert Hancock
2011-10-15 8:43 ` Chris Palmer
2011-10-15 16:23 ` Robert Hancock
[not found] ` <4EE72C4D.9080207@pobox.com>
2011-12-14 0:12 ` Fwd: " Edward Donovan
[not found] ` <CADdbW+E9=DKZ-839yPW_R4JM1omXEzqGqT=ae7Txu4Jikyw2=A@mail.gmail.com>
2011-12-14 10:49 ` Chris Palmer [this message]
2011-10-15 16:51 ` Thomas Backlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE87F47.7020500@pobox.com \
--to=chris.palmer@pobox.com \
--cc=edward.donovan@numble.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).