From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758036Ab1LNT2E (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:28:04 -0500 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:50419 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757872Ab1LNT2C (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:28:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4EE8F8B2.3020203@landley.net> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:27:46 -0600 From: Rob Landley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: slyich@gmail.com, aboriginal@lists.landley.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, jakub@redhat.com Subject: Re: Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1. References: <20111214.125443.973289484729064945.davem@davemloft.net> <20111214.131810.916491563666428853.davem@davemloft.net> <20111214215516.26ffe884@sf.home> <20111214.141316.931101347023790867.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20111214.141316.931101347023790867.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/14/2011 01:13 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Sergei Trofimovich > Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:55:16 +0300 > >>> sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation. >>> >>> The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore' >>> but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit >>> symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller >> >> Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich >> >> Was about to send exactly the same. Thanks! > > Thanks for testing Sergei. > Is that the line we're using now? I'm out of touch... Tested-by: Rob Landley Rob