From: Julian Sikorski <belegdol@gmail.com>
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug report: irq 19: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:02:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEB0923.3000707@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EEB0364.1060101@ladisch.de>
W dniu 16.12.2011 09:37, Clemens Ladisch pisze:
> Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 15.12.2011 18:49, Clemens Ladisch pisze:
>>> Was it the JMB38x that used a wrong interface number in its PCIe
>>> transactions, which would make the I/O-MMU map it to the wrong device?
>>> [...]
>>> add the kernel parameter intel_iommu=off to the boot loader.
>>
>> This did not work
>
>> 00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 2
>> Bus: primary=00, secondary=03, subordinate=03, sec-latency=0
>> 00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 4
>> Bus: primary=00, secondary=05, subordinate=05, sec-latency=0
>> ...
>> 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: JMicron Technology Corp. JMC250 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 05)
>> 03:00.1 System peripheral: JMicron Technology Corp. SD/MMC Host Controller (rev 90)
>> 03:00.2 SD Host controller: JMicron Technology Corp. Standard SD Host Controller (rev 90) (prog-if 01)
>> 03:00.3 System peripheral: JMicron Technology Corp. MS Host Controller (rev 90)
>> 05:00.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): JMicron Technology Corp. IEEE 1394 Host Controller (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
>
> Sorry, I didn't notice before that your FireWire controller is
> a physically separate chip on another PCIe port, so whatever is
> happening is unlikely to be related with another device.
>
> It appears that the JMB381 is not correctly reinitialized when doing
> a suspend/resume. However, the driver already does a reset of the chip,
> so it isn't clear what else could be done. This might be a problem
> with the PCI initialization as done by the BIOS; try a BIOS update, if
> possible.
>
>
> Regards,
> Clemens
I am already running the latest BIOS.
Is there a quirk list somewhere which would force irqpoll for certain
machines/drivers?
Julian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-16 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-15 14:30 bug report: irq 19: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Julian Sikorski
2011-12-15 14:33 ` Julian Sikorski
2011-12-15 15:56 ` Clemens Ladisch
2011-12-15 16:04 ` Julian Sikorski
2011-12-15 17:49 ` Clemens Ladisch
2011-12-15 17:56 ` Julian Sikorski
2011-12-16 8:37 ` Clemens Ladisch
2011-12-16 9:02 ` Julian Sikorski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EEB0923.3000707@gmail.com \
--to=belegdol@gmail.com \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox