From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751512Ab1LRJKh (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:10:37 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46179 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751241Ab1LRJKf (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:10:35 -0500 Message-ID: <4EEDADF1.3040305@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 11:10:09 +0200 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Habouzit CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: allow preempt notifiers to self-unregister. References: <1324052151-3714-1-git-send-email-pierre.habouzit@intersec.com> In-Reply-To: <1324052151-3714-1-git-send-email-pierre.habouzit@intersec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/16/2011 06:15 PM, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > As a background, this need is because I have some kind of module code > that uses this facility to evaluate how many of a group of threads are > concurrently running (to regulate a pool of threads). > That's what's cmwq is supposed to be doing (and that too should be using preempt notifiers, IMO). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function