linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
To: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Ed Nadolski <edmund.nadolski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix blk_queue_end_tag()
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:48:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EF18129.7030407@tao.ma> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1112210835010.6858@math.ut.ee>

On 12/21/2011 02:36 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>>> -	if (unlikely(tag >= bqt->max_depth)) {
>>> +	if (WARN_ONCE(tag >= bqt->real_max_depth,
>>> +		      "%s: tag %d greater than tag map size: %d\n",
>>> +		      __func__, tag, bqt->real_max_depth)) {
>>>  		/*
>>>  		 * This can happen after tag depth has been reduced.
>> Please also change the comments here since it should never happen in the
>> right workload.
> 
> What do you mean by right workload? Normal workload?
yeah, so real_max_depth is the maximum depth we ever have. So in normal
case(shrinking queue depth is also a normal user case), we should never
arrive here. In another word, if tag >= real_max_depth, we should have a
bug in the kernel.

Thanks
Tao

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-21  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-20 23:33 [PATCH] block: fix blk_queue_end_tag() Dan Williams
2011-12-21  6:33 ` Tao Ma
2011-12-21  6:36   ` Meelis Roos
2011-12-21  6:48     ` Tao Ma [this message]
2011-12-21  7:30       ` Williams, Dan J
2011-12-21  8:16         ` Tao Ma
2011-12-21  8:22           ` Williams, Dan J
2011-12-21 10:05             ` Jens Axboe
2011-12-21 13:20         ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-12-21 17:37           ` Williams, Dan J

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EF18129.7030407@tao.ma \
    --to=tm@tao.ma \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=boyu.mt@taobao.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=edmund.nadolski@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mroos@linux.ee \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).