Re: Print PCI device in power management warning.

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>]

On 12/23/2011 12:46 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 04:26:35PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>  
>  > don't you just want:
>  > 
>  > 	WARN(ret && drv->driver.pm, "pci: %s Has both legacy and new PM
>  > support!\n", drv_name(drv));
>  > 
>  > which will do what it previously does and also add the message you
>  > wanted to add?
> 
> close. Not sure what drv_name() is, but I don't seem to have it in my tree.
> This works though..
> 
> --- 
> 
> When the WARN_ON in pci_has_legacy_pm_support() triggers, we get
> users filing backtraces, but it's not obvious which driver is
> triggering the trace.  Printing the driver name in addition to the trace
> should make these easier to debug.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> index 12d1e81..8af9ff2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static bool pci_has_legacy_pm_support(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
>  	 * supported as well.  Drivers are supposed to support either the
>  	 * former, or the latter, but not both at the same time.
>  	 */
> -	WARN_ON(ret && drv->driver.pm);
> +	WARN(ret && drv->driver.pm, "pci: %s Has both legacy and new PM support!\n", drv->name);

	                                     has

and why not cc: linux-pci?


>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> --


-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***