From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754425Ab2ADI6Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2012 03:58:25 -0500 Received: from e28smtp09.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.9]:56104 "EHLO e28smtp09.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753975Ab2ADI6Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2012 03:58:24 -0500 Message-ID: <4F041496.5030905@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:27:58 +0530 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Linux PM mailing list , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: microcode should perform update after suspend to disk References: <4F03ECAF.4080207@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F0413A6.4060704@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F0413A6.4060704@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit x-cbid: 12010408-2674-0000-0000-000002D96A05 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/04/2012 02:23 PM, Sven Köhler wrote: > Am 04.01.2012 07:07, schrieb Srivatsa S. Bhat: >> Which kernel version are you using? > > I was using 3.1.4 or something. However, I updated to 3.1.7 lately. > Sorry, I should have mentioned that. > >> I tried doing suspend-to-ram and suspend-to-disk on latest kernel (3.2-rc7+) >> and I saw exactly the same messages getting emitted from the microcode >> module in both cases. Not sure what is going wrong in your case... > > I'm absolutely puzzled, cause I just tried to reproduce it again, and > microcode was updated successfully during resume from suspend to disk. I > apologize for the noise. > Good to hear that everything is fine :-) Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat