From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752479Ab2AJFkY (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:40:24 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7167 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751680Ab2AJFkX (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:40:23 -0500 Message-ID: <4F0BCF3B.4050901@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:40:11 -0500 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hillf Danton CC: linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: cleanup with s/reclaim_mode/isolate_mode/ References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/06/2012 09:01 AM, Hillf Danton wrote: > With tons of reclaim_mode(defined as one field of struct scan_control) already > in the file, it is clearer to rename it when setting up the isolation mode. > > > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > Cc: David Rientjes > Cc: Andrew Morton > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel -- All rights reversed