From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751043Ab2APXH2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:07:28 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:51547 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750715Ab2APXH1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:07:27 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="99280024" Message-ID: <4F14AD99.80905@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:07:05 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: nbowler@elliptictech.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, alan@linux.intel.com, tomoya.rohm@gmail.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, jdmason@kudzu.us, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pch_gbe: Use a randomly generated MAC instead of failing probe References: <132d2a41a089905de3147b4656e350608aa7fd6f.1326523495.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> <20120114.001525.2158050844390627233.davem@davemloft.net> <20120116152239.GA9953@elliptictech.com> <20120116.180433.986989348820850613.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20120116.180433.986989348820850613.davem@davemloft.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/16/2012 03:04 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Nick Bowler > Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:22:39 -0500 > >> On 2012-01-14 00:15 -0800, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Darren Hart >>> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:44:55 -0800 >>> >>>> CC: Jeff Kirsher (commit_signer:1/3=33%,commit_signer:1/8=12%) >>> >>> BTW, please try to figure out where this "commit_signer" stuff came from. >>> >>> It ended up corrupting the CC: list of your posting too. >> >> While it ended up on the CC line, the result is still a valid and >> correct email address per RFC 822. > > I didn't say it wasn't an "RFC compliant" email address, I just said > it's complete garbage. Indeed. An oversight on my part and I've addressed it. Apologies for the noise. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel