public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix c-state transitions when !NOHZ (nohz=off kernel parameter)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:22:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F15CA8A.5020400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326823968-3482-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com>



On 01/17/2012 01:12 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Some users do still boot with "nohz=off" which re-enables the old "tickfull"
> kernel and still want the (diminished) power savings of c-states.
> 
> When examining the c-state transitions for !NOHZ it was noticed that the
> processors never leaving the polling state.
> 
> ie) powertop shows 98-99% residency in POLLING for all cpus
> 
> This occurs  because the value of the current tick_sched's sleep_length
> is never updated from its initialized value if !NOHZ.  sleep_length is used
> by the cpuidle code (via a call to tick_nohz_get_sleep_length()) to determine
> how long a cpu should sleep for and in what c-state.
> 
> Admittedly I am not overly familiar with this code and there may be some
> unknown repercussion from doing this.  I can say that experimentally across
> several systems I do see the cpus going into deeper c-states after making
> this change, and there does not appear to be anything wrong with the system.
> 
> ----8<----
> 
> Fix c-state transitions when !NOHZ (nohz=off kernel parameter)
> 
> The value of sleep_length needs to be updated for the !NOHZ case in
> order for processor c-state transitions to work.
> 
> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Nuts -- I completely forgot

Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>

(Thanks Len)

P.

> ---
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    4 +++-
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 7656642..d2e2782 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -300,8 +300,10 @@ static void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts)
>  			tick_do_timer_cpu = TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (unlikely(ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE))
> +	if (unlikely(ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE)) {
> +		ts->sleep_length = ktime_sub(dev->next_event, now);
>  		return;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (need_resched())
>  		return;

      reply	other threads:[~2012-01-17 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-17 18:12 [PATCH] Fix c-state transitions when !NOHZ (nohz=off kernel parameter) Prarit Bhargava
2012-01-17 19:22 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F15CA8A.5020400@redhat.com \
    --to=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox