From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757280Ab2ARJd5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:33:57 -0500 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.110]:46866 "EHLO e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757104Ab2ARJdz (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:33:55 -0500 Message-ID: <4F1691FF.5010703@de.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:33:51 +0100 From: Christian Borntraeger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: Ingo Molnar , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/s390: fix compile error in sched/core.c References: <1326268696-30904-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1326272868.2442.122.camel@twins> In-Reply-To: <1326272868.2442.122.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 12011809-1948-0000-0000-000000AB2D0C Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/01/12 10:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Weird, I would have expected -next to pick this up.. Anyway, no > objection although do we really need that extra #ifdef ? Ping. Do you want me to resubmit without ifdefs?