From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel crash in icq_free_icq_rcu
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:31:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F16F3CA.90904@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F16F245.9000708@kernel.dk>
On 2012-01-18 17:24, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2012-01-18 17:09, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:20:05AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>>> Not allocating icq if request is never going to go to elevator as elevator
>>>> switch was happening makes sense to me.
>>>>
>>>> I tried this patch. It went little further and crashed at a different
>>>> place. I think this seems to be separate merging issue Tejun is trying
>>>> to track down.
>>>
>>> Applied Tejun's debug patch to return early and not call into elevator
>>> for checking whether merge is allowed or not. Things seems to be stable
>>> now for me.
>>
>> Yeah, plug merge is calling into elevator code without any
>> synchronization, so it's bound to be broken. Given plugging is
>> per-task, I don't think we really need to query elevator about merging
>> bio's. The request is not on elevator and plugging is part of issuing
>> mechanism, not scheduling, after all. Jens, what do you think?
>
> Hmmm. We can bypass asking the elevator, as long as we query the
> restrictions. Does the below, by itself, resolve the crash? If yes, let
> me cook up a patch splitting the elv and blk rq merging logic.
Something like the below, completely untested.
But thinking about this a bit while doing it, why is the IO scheduler
going away while we have plugged requests that are elvpriv?
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index e6c05a9..75eba5c 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ static bool attempt_plug_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio,
if (rq->q != q)
continue;
- el_ret = elv_try_merge(rq, bio);
+ el_ret = blk_try_merge(rq, bio);
if (el_ret == ELEVATOR_BACK_MERGE) {
ret = bio_attempt_back_merge(q, rq, bio);
if (ret)
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index cfcc37c..ee9ec90 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -471,3 +471,59 @@ int blk_attempt_req_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
{
return attempt_merge(q, rq, next);
}
+
+int blk_rq_merge_ok(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ if (!rq_mergeable(rq))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Don't merge file system requests and discard requests
+ */
+ if ((bio->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD) != (rq->bio->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Don't merge discard requests and secure discard requests
+ */
+ if ((bio->bi_rw & REQ_SECURE) != (rq->bio->bi_rw & REQ_SECURE))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * different data direction or already started, don't merge
+ */
+ if (bio_data_dir(bio) != rq_data_dir(rq))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * must be same device and not a special request
+ */
+ if (rq->rq_disk != bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk || rq->special)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * only merge integrity protected bio into ditto rq
+ */
+ if (bio_integrity(bio) != blk_integrity_rq(rq))
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_rq_merge_ok);
+
+int blk_try_merge(struct request *__rq, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ int ret = ELEVATOR_NO_MERGE;
+
+ /*
+ * we can merge and sequence is ok, check if it's possible
+ */
+ if (blk_rq_merge_ok(__rq, bio)) {
+ if (blk_rq_pos(__rq) + blk_rq_sectors(__rq) == bio->bi_sector)
+ ret = ELEVATOR_BACK_MERGE;
+ else if (blk_rq_pos(__rq) - bio_sectors(bio) == bio->bi_sector)
+ ret = ELEVATOR_FRONT_MERGE;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
index 7efd772..a117fa9 100644
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ int blk_attempt_req_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
struct request *next);
void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq);
void blk_rq_set_mixed_merge(struct request *rq);
+int blk_rq_merge_ok(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio);
+int blk_try_merge(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio);
void blk_queue_congestion_threshold(struct request_queue *q);
diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
index 91e18f8..a1a75f7 100644
--- a/block/elevator.c
+++ b/block/elevator.c
@@ -72,39 +72,8 @@ static int elv_iosched_allow_merge(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio)
*/
int elv_rq_merge_ok(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio)
{
- if (!rq_mergeable(rq))
+ if (!blk_rq_merge_ok(rq, bio))
return 0;
-
- /*
- * Don't merge file system requests and discard requests
- */
- if ((bio->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD) != (rq->bio->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD))
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * Don't merge discard requests and secure discard requests
- */
- if ((bio->bi_rw & REQ_SECURE) != (rq->bio->bi_rw & REQ_SECURE))
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * different data direction or already started, don't merge
- */
- if (bio_data_dir(bio) != rq_data_dir(rq))
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * must be same device and not a special request
- */
- if (rq->rq_disk != bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk || rq->special)
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * only merge integrity protected bio into ditto rq
- */
- if (bio_integrity(bio) != blk_integrity_rq(rq))
- return 0;
-
if (!elv_iosched_allow_merge(rq, bio))
return 0;
@@ -114,19 +83,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(elv_rq_merge_ok);
int elv_try_merge(struct request *__rq, struct bio *bio)
{
- int ret = ELEVATOR_NO_MERGE;
-
/*
* we can merge and sequence is ok, check if it's possible
*/
- if (elv_rq_merge_ok(__rq, bio)) {
- if (blk_rq_pos(__rq) + blk_rq_sectors(__rq) == bio->bi_sector)
- ret = ELEVATOR_BACK_MERGE;
- else if (blk_rq_pos(__rq) - bio_sectors(bio) == bio->bi_sector)
- ret = ELEVATOR_FRONT_MERGE;
- }
+ if (elv_rq_merge_ok(__rq, bio))
+ return blk_try_merge(__rq, bio);
- return ret;
+ return ELEVATOR_NO_MERGE;
}
static struct elevator_type *elevator_find(const char *name)
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-18 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-17 20:18 Kernel crash in icq_free_icq_rcu Vivek Goyal
2012-01-17 20:19 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-17 20:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-17 20:42 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-17 20:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-17 21:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-17 21:48 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-17 22:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-18 1:01 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-18 1:03 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-18 1:05 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-18 1:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-18 1:30 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-18 2:26 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-18 4:23 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-18 6:03 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-18 13:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-18 14:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-18 16:09 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-18 16:24 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-18 16:31 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2012-01-18 16:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-18 17:10 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-18 19:07 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-18 19:05 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-18 16:55 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-18 16:07 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 1:41 ` [patch]block: fix NULL icq_cache reference Shaohua Li
2012-01-19 1:43 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 8:20 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F16F3CA.90904@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox