From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>,
Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings sysfs tunable
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:12:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F201BE4.6000503@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327504213.2614.78.camel@laptop>
On 1/25/2012 7:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
btw... any reason why this feature is a config option with tons of
ifdefs... why not just have this available all the time?
it shouldn't be all that much code in the first place.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-25 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-16 16:22 [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings tunables Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-16 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings sysfs tunable Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-25 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 10:42 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-26 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 11:26 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-26 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 12:13 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-26 12:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 12:46 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-28 12:06 ` [tip:sched/core] sched, block: Unify cache detection tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27 9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings sysfs tunable Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-25 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27 9:16 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-25 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-25 15:12 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2012-01-25 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27 9:22 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-27 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-16 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] sched: fix group_capacity for thread level consolidation Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-25 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27 9:10 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-17 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings tunables Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F201BE4.6000503@linux.intel.com \
--to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).