From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751819Ab2AYSvO (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:51:14 -0500 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:52540 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751182Ab2AYSvL (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:51:11 -0500 Message-ID: <4F204F1C.70908@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:51:08 -0600 From: Rob Herring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Cousson, Benoit" CC: Grant Likely , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Milton Miller , benh@kernel.crashing.org, Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [RFCv2 00/14] References: <1327352870-14687-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <4F1DD6DF.4080706@gmail.com> <4F200DFD.7070407@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <4F200DFD.7070407@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/25/2012 08:13 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > On 1/23/2012 10:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On 01/23/2012 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >>> >>> Hey everyone, >>> >>> Here's the second RFC for the irq_domain patches. I could use some >>> help testing now. I still expect there will be a few bugs. The >>> series is based on v3.3-rc1, and I've pushed it out to my git server: >>> >>> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git irqdomain/next >> >> Can you post to linux-arm-kernel too so people are aware of this work >> and stop posting dead-end irqdomain patches. > > Good point, I have two pending series that are using the > irq_domain_add() so far, so it will be good to have that branch pulled > in arm-soc. > >> I tested what you had as of this morning and it works fine for me. Looks >> like the only diff is the VExpress code. I'm working on rebasing my >> domain support for generic irqchip now. > > In fact your generic irqchip should even avoid us to use > irq_domain_add_legacy() since both GPIO and OMAP3 intc are already using > the irqchip. > > I guess you are not going to change the interface so the patches I did > on your previous branch to try them should be good already, isn't it? I've got it rebased on top of Grant's tree. I will send it out soon. One problem that still remains is it breaks x86 and any platform using generic irq chip, but not selecting IRQ_DOMAIN. Grant, do you plan to enable IRQ_DOMAIN for x86 in your series? MIPS may also need fixing. Rob