linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why are not processes HUPped when they open /dev/console?
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:15:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2151FD.4050101@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120125214522.7a49cf39@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>

On 01/25/2012 10:45 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:38:40 +0100
> Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> don't you remember by a chance the reason for this test in __tty_hangup:
>>   if (filp->f_op->write != tty_write)
>>
>> The logic there is not to HUP processes that have this tty open via
>> /dev/console.
> 
> Because if you hang up the console the machine crashes ?
>
> At least that's what used to happen.

It does not crash anymore. However the system (systemd more precisely)
is confused a bit (well, a huge). So I suppose the test has its meaning.

The whole exercise was about how to fix the userspace issue introduced
by the added infinite timeout.

I think the proper solution here is just not to call vhangup in
userspace for the device which is /dev/console. It never worked anyway.
Because the HUP signal was never sent and it always timed out.

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-26 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-25 21:38 Why are not processes HUPped when they open /dev/console? Jiri Slaby
2012-01-25 21:45 ` Alan Cox
2012-01-26 13:15   ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2012-02-06 19:24     ` Pavel Machek
2012-02-07  9:58       ` Jiri Slaby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F2151FD.4050101@suse.cz \
    --to=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).